My libertarian
side decries such legislation as both an unnecessary governmental overreach,
and an unnecessary expense forced upon businesses and the public. That’s my
reactionary self focused side coming to the fore as in my every day life such
ergonomic friendly devices provide me little value to my life, do not give me
any greater freedom and mobility. That’s me being centered upon my own life, my
current needs and protecting my pocketbook without giving any thought to how
such handicap and senior friendly levers provide the elderly and those with
physical handicaps with a greater level of mobility and independence.
When I think
of my parents and mother-in-law, the value of levers becomes increasingly
apparent. When I think of the minor touches of arthritis I feel on damp days
may well become more serious out twenty years, the levers become more
attractive.
My
short-term self interest and that quieter bent against governmental interference
argues that if I need such levers, then I should be free to install them in my
home but I should not regulate their installation elsewhere. Then pausing I
realize that my argument against such a law is arguing against my future
self-interest. While my home could have levers, if they are not commonly found
elsewhere then I start to become a prisoner in my own home, for while I could
move readily around my own private space, going into the public space to move visit
government facilities, medical facilities, churches, businesses and friends would
be another matter. If I lacked the muscle dexterity required to turn a doorknob
I could not open doors and thereby my mobility and independence is undermined.
So functionally places with round knobs would not be places I could readily
visit.
So when my community minded side pushes to the fore, my less self-centered side, I
start to think about the overall value to the community, to my aging parents and for my
ultimate self-interest, I view of Vancouver’s law more warmly. When I note that
the dexterity and mobility of myself and friends will be far less in two
decades, I wish other jurisdictions would take similar steps for our overall collective
good. The cost differential between the traditional knob system and a lever
system is minimal. Vancouver’s law is not unwarranted government intrusion.
Rather it is a proactive law helping the community to become more senior and handicap
friendly.
No comments:
Post a Comment