It is evident
that the ethic profile of the United States is changing, but so is America’s religious
profile. In the 1950s church attendance
across all denominations was strong, with three out of four Americans attending
church services at least three times a year. In this same decade over 85% of
Americans considered themselves to be “religious”. In the mid 60’s dramatic
shift that lasted for a little over two decades commenced with the growth in
the conservative Baptist and evangelical churches as people left mainline
churches for conservative congregations.
In August 2012
the Washington Post reported the number of Americans claiming to be “religious”
had decreased from around 73% in 2005 to around 60%. That same article noted
that atheists make up about 5% of the American public, up from around the 1%
level of the late 80s.
As noted in a
past post, the evangelical church is in decline, a decline that will become
starkly evident over the coming decade. Many evangelicals argue the decline is a
result of a lack of religious fervor and conviction in their churches and
society as a whole. They argue that the church and nation is decline because
prayer has been taken out of the schools, gay marriage and rampant disregard
for biblical teachings.
While lack of
broad fervor may be a factor in the decline of the evangelical church, it is a
minor factor. The two primary causes for the decline are entangled somewhat.
First, the group that flooded into the evangelic churches between 1965 and 1985
as a reaction to social changes occurring in that era are aging rapidly. Their
children and grandchildren are not attending evangelical churches at the same
rate. While not the only cause, significant declines in attendance, particularly
amongst those below the age of 30 follow on the heels of periods of strident political
activity within the evangelical church.
My intent here
is not to judge one way or the other the appropriateness of such action on a
particular issue or set of issues. My intent is to note that there is a
correlation between the evangelical church’s manifest fervor on particular issues
and the younger generation remaining within or being attracted to the
evangelical teachings. What is evident is that there was a cost to the
evangelical churches the more they became politically engaged on a host of
social, cultural and financial issues. It increasingly appears that their political
activity has left those who came into adulthood since the early 1990s feeling
that the evangelical church has no answers for them. While some of the younger
generation are returning to mainline churches, for a more balanced approach,
more often than not the younger generation are not looking to any organized
faith for sucker and guidance.
Hence, the
evangelical finds itself with an aging membership. In many congregations the
largest age block are those over the age of 60. Attendance is slowly declining,
and will become more rapid as their largest block of members start to enter
nursing homes and pass away.
This shift was
evidenced in this past election, an election which on so many levels Romney should
have won by a spread of at least 7. With this economy, if the values and the
demographics of the late 80s and early 90s were in place Romney would have won
easily. Then the evangelical church, the heart of the Republican base, was
strong and the younger generation was still somewhat religiously connected.
November’s exit
polls showed that those who claim to have faith of some manner but with no
specific religious affiliation, called “nones” in the data, made up 12 percent
of the electorate in 2012. This is up by 3 points from 2000 and double the 1980
level. Further, the number of people who say that they do not attend church or
house of worship stood at 17 percent. The Republican base is shrinking.
That this
level the “nones” make up a voting block as large as the Hispanic. These “none”
broke for the Democrats by over 40%. If one adds into the mix the atheists, the
voting block becomes more significant. The block will only grow. America is becoming more pluralistic.
Hopefully the Republicans can make the adjustment.
No comments:
Post a Comment